| Governance Indicator Ranking Results | ||||||||
| Healthy Reefs for Healthy People | ||||||||
| Governance Issue | Governance questions | Indicator | Criteria I | Criteria II | Criteria III | Criteria IV | Criteria V | |
| Relevance to the MAR | Data Availability | Scientific Soundness | Management responsiveness | Transparency and Understandability | ||||
| 1. Land tenure | Who owns the land? | Population enjoying secure tenure over traditional lands and offshore resources (%) | ||||||
| Population maintaining traditional tenure/ownership rights (%) | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | |||
| Population with regulated users rights (%) | ||||||||
| 2. Gender equality | Are rights/licenses to offshore resources, including fishing rights, being distributed fairly? | Rights/licenses to offshore resources, including fishing rights, distributed to local people (%) | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |
| Rights/licenses to offshore resources, including fishing rights, distributed to others (%) | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Are resource utilization conflicts being resolved effectively? | Known resource utilization conflicts resolved through voluntary agreements (%) | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | ||
| Known resource utilization conflicts resolved through law enforcement (%) | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Known resource utilization conflicts unresolved (%) | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Is education accessible regardless of gender and/or socio-economic status? | Increase in no. of girls registered in primary schools | High | High | High | High | High | ||
| Changes in drop-out rate by socio-economic grouping and gender | High | High | High | High | High | |||
| Are gender issues such as women's empowerment being addressed? | Positions in local government held by women (%) | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | Moderate | ||
| Men and women registered as voters in local elections (%) | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Attendance at stakeholder meetings by gender (%) | High | Low | Moderate | Moderate | High | |||
| Level of contribution at stakeholder meetings by gender (%) | High | Low | Moderate | Moderate | High | |||
| Number of women in local institutions (associations) | High | Low | Moderate | Moderate | High | |||
| Number of groups promoting women's rights | High | High | High | High | High | |||
| Changes in employment/ unemployment rate of women and men | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Changes in percentage of property owned by men and women | High | High | Moderate | High | High | |||
| 3. Land/off shore resource planning | What is the level of government support for local participation in land use and aquatic resource planning? | Level of government support for local participation in land use and aquatic resource planning: mandatory | High | High | High | High | High | |
| Level of government support for local participation in land use and aquatic resource planning: non-mandatory | High | High | High | High | High | |||
| Are stakeholder meetings improving in frequency/effectiveness? | Over time changes in frequency of stakeholder meetings by invitation | Moderate | Low | Moderate | High | High | ||
| Over time changes in frequency of stakeholder meetings as public hearings | Moderate | Low | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Over time changes in frequency of level of attendance at stakeholder meetings | Moderate | Low | Moderate | High | High | |||
| How is information policy affecting resource planning? | Information policy: regulatory obligation | High | High | Moderate | High | High | ||
| Information policy: non regulatory applied practice | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Information policy: planning phases | High | High | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Information policy: Regulations on access to information about the environment | High | High | Moderate | High | High | |||
| What is the impact of Environmental Impact Assessment report (EIA) on resource planning? | Environmental Impact Assessment report(EIA): Lead time and form of public notification | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | ||
| Environmental Impact Assessment report(EIA): Degree of engagement of affected parties | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Environmental Impact Assessment report(EIA): Lead time for public comments on draft EIA | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| Environmental Impact Assessment report(EIA): Comprehensiveness of consultation with affected parties and the public | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | High | |||
| 4. Minority rights | How are minority rights being addressed? | Provisions in the legal system for fundamental rights and freedoms. | High | High | Moderate | High | High | |
| Legislation with requirements of the UN declaration on Rights for Indigenous People | High | High | Moderate | Moderate | High | |||
| Provisions for protecting the rights of indigenous people in the management of the coastal zone resources. | High | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | High | |||
| Ranking results are adapted from: Maffi et al., draft report for World Bank (2004). | ||||||||